View source for Talk:CodingConventions - Globulation2


	Search


	View source for Talk:CodingConventions From Globulation2 ← Talk:CodingConventions Jump to: navigation, search You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason: The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users. You can view and copy the source of this page. ===Steph's review=== I fully agree to change numberOfFoo to fooCount, the latter is much better. Funny, in your example of enum you break the "we should not use underscore" convention. For getter/setter, I think there is more room for discussion, although in principle I tend to agree with you. --[[User:Nct\|Nct]] 15:48, 19 November 2005 (PST) ==GeniXPro's review== I agree to change numberOfFoo to fooCount. The getter/setter thing I'm against, we should always use get/set foo, the idea is that your not supposed to know how much proccessing is done, the implementation is "abstract" from proccessing amount. So, you shouldn't design your code based on how much time a function takes (I'm not saying write inefficient code or ignore effiency as a matter). That way, if the functions implementation suddenly becomes simpler or more complex, the code that uses it shouldn't have to change to. --[[User:Genixpro\|Genixpro]] 20:38, 26 January 2006 (PST) Return to Talk:CodingConventions. Retrieved from "http://globulation2.org/wiki/Talk:CodingConventions" Page Discussion View source History


	Players Download & Install Screenshots Videos User Manual FAQ Forum Chat Report A Bug


	Developers Developer Center Contributor Center Source Access Mailing Lists View Bugs View Old Bugs


	Misc Legal


	Tools Recent Wiki Changes What links here Related changes Special pages


	Create account Log in