Difference between revisions of "Talk:CodingConventions"

Steph's review

I fully agree to change numberOfFoo to fooCount, the latter is much better. Funny, in your example of enum you break the "we should not use underscore" convention.

For getter/setter, I think there is more room for discussion, although in principle I tend to agree with you.

--Nct 15:48, 19 November 2005 (PST)

GeniXPro's review

I agree to change numberOfFoo to fooCount. The getter/setter thing I'm against, we should always use get/set foo, the idea is that your not supposed to know how much proccessing is done, the implementation is "abstract" from proccessing amount. So, you shouldn't design your code based on how much time a function takes (I'm not saying write inefficient code or ignore effiency as a matter). That way, if the functions implementation suddenly becomes simpler or more complex, the code that uses it shouldn't have to change to.

--Genixpro 20:38, 26 January 2006 (PST)