|
|
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
Hi Bandoras! Thanx or helping in the wiki. if zyou have questions on some articles please write them to the discussion-page of the page in question. I reverted an entry of yours under [units]. Ask there and i will get back to you as soon as i have mor time. --[[User:Giszmo|Giszmo]] 01:10, 14 October 2006 (PDT) |
|
Hi Bandoras! Thanx or helping in the wiki. if zyou have questions on some articles please write them to the discussion-page of the page in question. I reverted an entry of yours under [units]. Ask there and i will get back to you as soon as i have mor time. --[[User:Giszmo|Giszmo]] 01:10, 14 October 2006 (PDT) |
|
|
|
|
|
:You are welcome. The text I changed looks absurd for somebody new to the game. I think it needs at last "sic!" in there (if it's indeed true). |
|
|
|
|
|
::It is still true in .21. if you have a better idea to balance out fruits go ahead and discuss it in the forum or on the mailing list. wiki artikles should show facts and not questions or discussions. |
|
|
::apart from the above i agree with you that fruits should make units rather healthier than weaker, but as they are globs and not humans imagine fruits to be candy and it somehow fits ;) --[[User:Giszmo|Giszmo]] 11:18, 15 October 2006 (PDT) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::After some playing I now see this as not so absurd. Especially if the armor cannot get negative. Nevertheless, I've related to you the reaction of a new player reading this. I still think a note that this sounds absurd but is actually sensible and that armor cannot get below zero would be a good thing in the relevant article. |
|
|
|
|
|
::::Can you read code? The reason I don't touch this in the wiki is that I'm not quite sure about the exact behaviour. I mean from having played with fruits i don't believe that 3 fruits result in additional 30 damage per hit. but to exactly know it i would have to read the code. --[[User:Giszmo|Giszmo]] 00:13, 20 October 2006 (PDT) |
|
|
|
|
|
[Resetting indents] Oh, my God, this is C++! =:O Sorry, it would taint me. Such a novel and fun game... Oh, my... But I wish you good luck, anyway. Hmmm, I'll just take a quick peek... Unit.cpp says: |
|
|
|
|
|
//! Return the real armor, taking into account the reduction due to fruits |
|
|
int Unit::getRealArmor(void) const |
|
|
{ |
|
|
int armorReductionPerHappyness = race->getUnitType(typeNum, |
|
|
level[ARMOR])->armorReductionPerHappyness; |
|
|
return performance[ARMOR] - fruitCount * armorReductionPerHappyness; |
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
|
and data/units.txt says: |
|
|
|
|
|
armor = 10 |
|
|
[...] |
|
|
armorReductionPerHappyness = 10; |
|
|
|
|
|
so it can mean 1 fruit negates armor and 3 fruits result in armor value being -20. However, this is probably object-oriented code, so a quick peek is worth nothing --- answers to such questions (and to "what does performance[] mean?") are scattered throughout the whole inheritance tree for the related objects. Sorry... |
|
|
|
|
|
Hehe, I couldn't resist ;) --- the same code is duplicated in, like 3 places, and here is the best one: |
|
|
|
|
|
globalContainer->gfx->drawString(globalContainer |
|
|
->gfx->getW()-124, ypos, globalContainer->littleFont, |
|
|
FormatableString("%0 : %1 |
|
|
= %2 - %3 * %4").arg(Toolkit::getStringTable()-> |
|
|
getString("[armor]")).arg(realArmor).arg(selUnit-> |
|
|
performance[ARMOR]).arg(selUnit->fruitCount). |
|
|
arg(armorReductionPerHappyness).c_str()); |
|
|
|
|
|
OK, I have to bail out --- I feel I almost understand that last one --- a bad sign. :> |
|
|
|
|
|
When you want to rewrite that game in a decent, or even a modern language, let me know, so I can suggest and perhaps even help. However, the current art, concept, style and, as far as I can tell, gameplay, is really outstanding. |
|
|
|
|
|
--[[User:Bandobras|Bandobras]] 12:47, 11 November 2006 (PST) |
Latest revision as of 20:47, 11 November 2006
Hi Bandoras! Thanx or helping in the wiki. if zyou have questions on some articles please write them to the discussion-page of the page in question. I reverted an entry of yours under [units]. Ask there and i will get back to you as soon as i have mor time. --Giszmo 01:10, 14 October 2006 (PDT)
- You are welcome. The text I changed looks absurd for somebody new to the game. I think it needs at last "sic!" in there (if it's indeed true).
- It is still true in .21. if you have a better idea to balance out fruits go ahead and discuss it in the forum or on the mailing list. wiki artikles should show facts and not questions or discussions.
- apart from the above i agree with you that fruits should make units rather healthier than weaker, but as they are globs and not humans imagine fruits to be candy and it somehow fits ;) --Giszmo 11:18, 15 October 2006 (PDT)
- After some playing I now see this as not so absurd. Especially if the armor cannot get negative. Nevertheless, I've related to you the reaction of a new player reading this. I still think a note that this sounds absurd but is actually sensible and that armor cannot get below zero would be a good thing in the relevant article.
- Can you read code? The reason I don't touch this in the wiki is that I'm not quite sure about the exact behaviour. I mean from having played with fruits i don't believe that 3 fruits result in additional 30 damage per hit. but to exactly know it i would have to read the code. --Giszmo 00:13, 20 October 2006 (PDT)
[Resetting indents] Oh, my God, this is C++! =:O Sorry, it would taint me. Such a novel and fun game... Oh, my... But I wish you good luck, anyway. Hmmm, I'll just take a quick peek... Unit.cpp says:
//! Return the real armor, taking into account the reduction due to fruits
int Unit::getRealArmor(void) const
{
int armorReductionPerHappyness = race->getUnitType(typeNum,
level[ARMOR])->armorReductionPerHappyness;
return performance[ARMOR] - fruitCount * armorReductionPerHappyness;
}
and data/units.txt says:
armor = 10
[...]
armorReductionPerHappyness = 10;
so it can mean 1 fruit negates armor and 3 fruits result in armor value being -20. However, this is probably object-oriented code, so a quick peek is worth nothing --- answers to such questions (and to "what does performance[] mean?") are scattered throughout the whole inheritance tree for the related objects. Sorry...
Hehe, I couldn't resist ;) --- the same code is duplicated in, like 3 places, and here is the best one:
globalContainer->gfx->drawString(globalContainer
->gfx->getW()-124, ypos, globalContainer->littleFont,
FormatableString("%0 : %1
= %2 - %3 * %4").arg(Toolkit::getStringTable()->
getString("[armor]")).arg(realArmor).arg(selUnit->
performance[ARMOR]).arg(selUnit->fruitCount).
arg(armorReductionPerHappyness).c_str());
OK, I have to bail out --- I feel I almost understand that last one --- a bad sign. :>
When you want to rewrite that game in a decent, or even a modern language, let me know, so I can suggest and perhaps even help. However, the current art, concept, style and, as far as I can tell, gameplay, is really outstanding.
--Bandobras 12:47, 11 November 2006 (PST)